Growing up as a Sox fan I’ve had the pleasure of watching
the career of Mark Buehrle first & foremost throughout my life. It was a
pure joy and entertainment to say the least, there’s something special about rooting
for a guy that continually finds ways to defy the odds of the “experts”. When
Buehrle took the mound you knew he would give the Sox a good chance to win a
game and as an added bonus more times than not would give the bullpen some
rest. Buehrle was more than a typical innings-eater; he was a great pitcher
(still is!), much of which gets overshadowed.
Unless you’re a Sox fan or one who closely followed Buehrle
it’s quite easy to skim over him and the accomplishments he’s had throughout
his career. He’s won 3 gold gloves from 2009 to 2011, and could be well on his
way to his 4th straight. He’s thrown two no hitters, one of which
was perfect. He’s won a World Series, won a World Series game, and on top of
that saved one too. As well as been a part of 4 All-Star teams. The
accomplishments are many especially coming from a soft tossing left hander and
these don’t even break the ice of the sabermetrics which is after all what
we’re about here.
Since assuming his role as a starter in 2001 till now he
ranks 4th in fWAR with 47.4. Just for reference the guys ahead of
him in fWAR are Halladay, CC, Oswalt, and Vazquez; the next 5 below are Johan,
Johnson, Hudson, Pettitte, and Schilling. To say the least Buehrle squeezed
himself in between some elite talent and yet hardly gets mentioned in the same
tier as many of the above. His peripherals don’t scream out of greatness as
some of the other may, but one area he dose exceed in is consistency and
durability.
Since becoming a full time starter, he’s accumulated 2,613.2
IP in 391 starts, both of which lead all of baseball from 2001 to 2012. He
hasn’t pitched below 201 IP in the past 11 seasons (which is nuts in itself,
which I’ll elaborate more on later) and will likely keep that streaking rolling
this year. Nor has he posted an fWAR below 3.4 with the exception of 2006
(1.9). He’s not only been durable but also been one of the elite pitchers in
baseball over this timeframe.
As mentioned earlier his peripherals don’t exactly measure
up to greatness, however over a certain period of time peripherals such as FIP
and xFIP don’t always tell the whole tale. Some players just have a knack or
skill of exceeding them and they should eventually be taken as the norm. Ichiro
and BABIP is one case of such and Buehrle along with mediocre career 4.14 FIP and 4.22 xFIP is another. However up until a few weeks ago we were
unable to quantify some of these effects had on pitchers, but with FanGraphs
new release of FDP (Fielding Dependant Pitching) we can now give more merit to
Buehrle’s game.
Name | RA9-Wins | BIP-Wins | LOB-Wins | FDP-Wins | RAR | WAR | FDP-WAR | New Rank |
Roy Halladay | 76.2 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 663.3 | 71.4 | 73.75 | 1st |
CC Sabathia | 61.6 | 1.5 | -0.8 | 0.7 | 583 | 60.9 | 61.25 | 2nd |
Roy Oswalt | 57.5 | -2.9 | 9.4 | 6.5 | 477.6 | 51 | 54.25 | 3rd |
Javier Vazquez | 42.5 | 2.3 | -7 | -4.6 | 450 | 47.1 | 44.5 | 7th |
Mark Buehrle | 55.5 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 8.4 | 467.9 | 47.4 | 51.6 | 5th |
Johan Santana | 58 | 10.3 | 0.6 | 10.9 | 451.8 | 47.1 | 52.55 | 4th |
Randy Johnson | 41.2 | -0.3 | -4.5 | -4.7 | 419.1 | 46 | 43.65 | 8th |
Tim Hudson | 57.1 | 9 | 4.5 | 13.5 | 423.1 | 43.6 | 50.35 | 6th |
Andy Pettitte | 36.6 | -7.1 | 0.5 | -6.6 | 418.7 | 43.2 | 39.9 | 10th |
Curt Schilling | 40.3 | -3.8 | 3.2 | -0.6 | 380.2 | 40.9 | 40.6 | 9th |
Since his move to starter Buehrle ranks 13th in
all of baseball in FDP-Wins with an 8.4. Then by using Dave Cameron’s
suggestion of cutting FDP-Win in half and adding them onto WAR we can see
Buehrle’s value ranks 5th in fWAR with a 51.6. FDP also tells us
Buehrle is also among few starters that succeed at limiting base runners to
begin with and even once they were on, he limiting them from scoring.
Even with all of this, the most remarkable feature Buehrle’s
shown in this time is his durability. Every single pitcher before and nearly
every pitcher after him on has been injured at one point or another. In fact
the only one that I can think that hasn't been hurt is Livan Hernandez and he’s nowhere near
Buehrle’s talent level; however feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. Yet it is
as if Buehrle is of a different species, he pitches, and then pitches some
more! And without hesitation you know what you’re going to get out of Buehrle
more so than nearly any other pitcher in all of baseball.
Buehrle has had an incredible career to date while going
very much under the radar thus far and despite his age is showing us he can
still succeed at a high level. Given his durability and consistency I wouldn’t
be surprised to see much of the same from Buerhle for many more years. In which
case if he continues to perform at a similar level he’ll soon be around the
coveted 60 fWAR mark in which many consider a benchmark minimum for the Hall of
Fame. He hasn’t overpowered or flashed his way into the record books, but has
shown the value of being durable and consistent. In a game where many pitchers
get hurt and a game where there’s been shown many ways to succeed; Buehrle
continues to give his case for consistency. I think it’s about time that he and
the value of consistency are taken seriously.
Vazquez and Derek Lowe also never visited the DL. There is nothing "coveted" about 60 fWAR and the HOF. Ask Tommy John, Rick Reuschel, Jim Kaat, Jerry Koosman, Mickey Lolich, Bret Saberhagen, and many others.
ReplyDeleteThanks for pointing out Lowe and Vazquez. As to your other point, I'm not outright saying Buehrle should be in the HOF his candidacy for the time being is borderline at best. However am saying 60 fWAR is considered to be a minimum for players to be in the discussion. And if he continues to do what he's doing, I don't see any reason why he shouldn't be up for consideration and in the discussion for one of the better pitchers in baseball for an extended period of time.
DeleteB-R actually has him in better shape, 86th overall compared to FG's 128th. To me, he's basically Glavine without that one big year. If Buehrle is effective for another 5-6 years, which is a pretty big if, he should be a HOFer.
DeleteWell actually Buehrle's one big year was 2005 and if basing off of fWAR he amassed 6.3, his career high compared to Glavine's 5.7 career high. So in that sense Buehrle was superior. However their differences in career highs are far from close using BR, Glavine wins by a landslide of 8.2 to 5.7. So there's no doubt a lot still has to unfold in Buehrle's favor, but I wouldn't be surprised if it did.
Delete